Any and every job position (including President) should be filled on the experience, training, education, and ethics of a person and not by their physical characteristics...
It's a shame that a majority of people have forgotten this...
Trolling by and leaving a short comment anonymously calling the poster a coward (and a racist) is... guess what? Cowardly and racist!
It is an example of a typical liberal argument consisting of no logic, only name-calling.
On the other hand, whites need to wake up to the race war being waged against them by the racist Democratic Party, the globalists, and above all, President Obama and his current administration.
A message to you so-called "progressives": the blowback to these years of change and war against whites will be fierce and unforgiving.
well the divisive part is be played out in the comment section. yeah, you will get labelled, because most people today can not stand criticism in any form.
He will be remembered for being the First Black President, and the Worst President, but most people that voted for him didn't do it because of his race or skin color. They voted for him because they're liberal. Also, Condolizza Rice prefers to be called Black, not African American. We're all American. What would you prefer being called, European American or White?
Oh please, many many many if not most voted for him BECAUSE he is black. Because what a thrill to finally have an African American in the whitehouse. Are you blind? Go to any inner city and ask any black person. People that say they didn't have blinders on and don't want to offend. Puh-leeze.....
he replaces Carter as the worst in history and Carter wasnt black . It has nothing to do with race its has to do with agenda they hold in their heart. I will say Carter loves America and Obama loves the brotherhood. Carter protected Isreal Obama not so much.
It's easy to say he's inept, corrupt, wasteful, subversive, divisive and destructive. It's another thing to give examples, not to just name call. Repubs refuse to see any positive progress he has made. You would rather just name-call.
But is he to be remembered because of his color, or because of who he ran against. There were better candidates, in all, who were not the parties choices. YOU GOT WHAT KARL ROVE AND HIS SPONSORS WANTED, NOT what was electable.
You are so solidly in the tank for Obama and the Democrats that you cannot admit the total failure of this administration. The government is not doing its job of protecting the constitutional rights of the American people. Healthcare is forced down our throats, thereby changing the nature of the relationship between government and the governed. You asked for specific examples, well, there you go. I doubt if it will do any good because as long as your guy is in office, all is well in your world.
It is easy to say Obama is inept, corrupt, wasteful, subversive, divisive and destructive because the evidence supports the statement. The US will never recover from Obama's efforts. Freedom is finished -- all in the name of what? Equality? What a joke that turned out to be.
Oh, and look here, no name calling -- although it would be truthful enough to say Obama is a Marxist, black nationalist whose past history indicates he is sympathetic to muslims at the expense of Christians AND he is out to destroy what he considers the white culture of the US.
So, Mr. 3:54, your brief comments have been addressed. I'd be willing to bet you'd vote for Obama again even after he is exposed for what he is. Why is that? Why would anyone vote against freedom? Oh yeah, you're one of those who believes they've exchanged freedom for security. The joke's on you...
Contrary to popular belief, saying something racial doesn't make you a racist.
Countless people have admitted to voting for Obama because they "wanted to be a part of history and elect the first black president." and blacks have admitted to voting for Obama because "He's a brother and will take care of his people." These are facts that clearly indicate Obama received votes merely due to the colour of his skin which is indeed racist behaviour. However, stating the fact doesn't make me or anyone else, stating racial facts, a racist.
12 comments:
Yes, it does. Because we all know you would rather call him the N-word but won't because you're a coward.
Not at all...
Any and every job position (including President) should be filled on the experience, training, education, and ethics of a person and not by their physical characteristics...
It's a shame that a majority of people have forgotten this...
What if I called him a traitor to the people and institutions of the US? Would that make me a racist?
What if I said he had an agenda against whites? Would that make me a racist?
What if I said we are pushing back against the crimes of this man? Would I be called a racist? Perhaps even a terrorist?
Then so be it.
Hey 8:58,
Trolling by and leaving a short comment anonymously calling the poster a coward (and a racist) is... guess what? Cowardly and racist!
It is an example of a typical liberal argument consisting of no logic, only name-calling.
On the other hand, whites need to wake up to the race war being waged against them by the racist Democratic Party, the globalists, and above all, President Obama and his current administration.
A message to you so-called "progressives": the blowback to these years of change and war against whites will be fierce and unforgiving.
well the divisive part is be played out in the comment section. yeah, you will get labelled, because most people today can not stand criticism in any form.
He will be remembered for being the First Black President, and the Worst President, but most people that voted for him didn't do it because of his race or skin color. They voted for him because they're liberal. Also, Condolizza Rice prefers to be called Black, not African American. We're all American. What would you prefer being called, European American or White?
Oh please, many many many if not most voted for him BECAUSE he is black. Because what a thrill to finally have an African American in the whitehouse. Are you blind? Go to any inner city and ask any black person. People that say they didn't have blinders on and don't want to offend. Puh-leeze.....
he replaces Carter as the worst in history and Carter wasnt black . It has nothing to do with race its has to do with agenda they hold in their heart. I will say Carter loves America and Obama loves the brotherhood. Carter protected Isreal Obama not so much.
It's easy to say he's inept, corrupt, wasteful, subversive, divisive and destructive.
It's another thing to give examples, not to just name call.
Repubs refuse to see any positive progress he has made. You would rather just name-call.
But is he to be remembered because of his color, or because of who he ran against. There were better candidates, in all, who were not the parties choices. YOU GOT WHAT KARL ROVE AND HIS SPONSORS WANTED, NOT what was electable.
3:54 --
You are so solidly in the tank for Obama and the Democrats that you cannot admit the total failure of this administration. The government is not doing its job of protecting the constitutional rights of the American people. Healthcare is forced down our throats, thereby changing the nature of the relationship between government and the governed. You asked for specific examples, well, there you go. I doubt if it will do any good because as long as your guy is in office, all is well in your world.
It is easy to say Obama is inept, corrupt, wasteful, subversive, divisive and destructive because the evidence supports the statement. The US will never recover from Obama's efforts. Freedom is finished -- all in the name of what? Equality? What a joke that turned out to be.
Oh, and look here, no name calling -- although it would be truthful enough to say Obama is a Marxist, black nationalist whose past history indicates he is sympathetic to muslims at the expense of Christians AND he is out to destroy what he considers the white culture of the US.
So, Mr. 3:54, your brief comments have been addressed. I'd be willing to bet you'd vote for Obama again even after he is exposed for what he is. Why is that? Why would anyone vote against freedom? Oh yeah, you're one of those who believes they've exchanged freedom for security. The joke's on you...
Contrary to popular belief, saying something racial doesn't make you a racist.
Countless people have admitted to voting for Obama because they "wanted to be a part of history and elect the first black president." and blacks have admitted to voting for Obama because "He's a brother and will take care of his people." These are facts that clearly indicate Obama received votes merely due to the colour of his skin which is indeed racist behaviour. However, stating the fact doesn't make me or anyone else, stating racial facts, a racist.
Post a Comment