"With all due respect to SCOTUS, it did not define marriage & therefore cannot re-define it." Franklin Graham
Would someone please refresh my memory? I didn't think the Supreme Court could make a law?
3 comments:
Anonymous
said...
They didn't make a law, they made a decision on a case presented to them. The 9 of them made a decision on how they interpreted the Constitution in regards to the case presented. 5 saw it one way, 4 saw it the other.
No, it won't be the end. Far from it. The comment about their birth certificates was cute too. The thing is, it doesn't matter to you who Obama is since the means justify the ends to your side, so it really doesn't make any difference. You guys are the fascists we've been warned about. You should understand though, there is going to be hell to pay. Things never stay the same, the pendulum swings back and forth...
The govt. did define marriage, long ago, when the legal entity of marriage was created. The problem is that the govt. took the church word and definition of marriage initially, and wrote it into the law. A different word should have been chosen for the legal entity. Now the law is changing the definition of the legal entity, and I guess no one foresaw this happening. Too bad, the word was already taken, and it's not right for someone outside the church to take it and change it. I'm not a lawyer, but it seems to me akin to theft of intellectual property.
3 comments:
They didn't make a law, they made a decision on a case presented to them. The 9 of them made a decision on how they interpreted the Constitution in regards to the case presented. 5 saw it one way, 4 saw it the other.
Maybe you should check their birth certificates.
The End
No, it won't be the end. Far from it. The comment about their birth certificates was cute too. The thing is, it doesn't matter to you who Obama is since the means justify the ends to your side, so it really doesn't make any difference. You guys are the fascists we've been warned about. You should understand though, there is going to be hell to pay. Things never stay the same, the pendulum swings back and forth...
The govt. did define marriage, long ago, when the legal entity of marriage was created. The problem is that the govt. took the church word and definition of marriage initially, and wrote it into the law. A different word should have been chosen for the legal entity. Now the law is changing the definition of the legal entity, and I guess no one foresaw this happening. Too bad, the word was already taken, and it's not right for someone outside the church to take it and change it. I'm not a lawyer, but it seems to me akin to theft of intellectual property.
Post a Comment